This is the root of every misunderstanding. Most people assume a return simply cancels the earlier charge. In fact the banking system has three completely different ways to give money back, and they behave very differently:
| Method | When possible | On your statement | FX loss |
|---|---|---|---|
| Void (reversal) | On the spot, same day, before the merchant captures | The charge never appears; the hold just drops off | None |
| Refund | Any time after the charge has posted | Two lines: the purchase and a credit | Yes โ the subject of this guide |
| Chargeback | When the merchant won't cooperate โ you dispute with your issuer | Two lines, plus a dispute process (weeks) | Usually restored at the original amount |
The biggest and least controllable piece. Your purchase is converted at the rate on its posting date; the refund is a separate new transaction converted at the rate on its own posting date. Whatever moved in between, you gain or lose.
And from handing the item back to the credit posting typically takes 5โ15 business days (merchant processing plus clearing), longer over holidays. A 1%โ3% move over two weeks is entirely normal.
If your card charges a foreign transaction fee (FTF) โ commonly 1.5%โ3% โ it was levied on the purchase. When you're refunded, most issuers do not give it back. Worse, a few treat the refund itself as a foreign transaction and charge again (increasingly rare, but check).
So on a 3% FTF card, buying and returning costs you 3% before the exchange rate even enters the picture. Which is exactly why a no-FTF card pays off most for people who return things.
This is the nastiest one, and entirely avoidable. If you originally chose to pay in your home currency (i.e. you got DCC'd), the refund goes through DCC too โ converted back by the same provider at their own rate on the refund date.
The result is the markup taken twice: they charged you at a rate ~4% worse than mid-market going in, and refund you at a rate ~4% worse than mid-market coming out. Round trip, around 8% simply evaporates โ nothing to do with market movement, just pure spread.
A proper refund references the original transaction (carrying its reference number). Plenty of small merchants instead key in a fresh refund by hand. Then you can get:
So check the currency and amount on the refund receipt at the counter, and keep it with the original. If you end up disputing, that pair is your evidence.
Assume a CNY card, mid-market 1 EUR = 7.80 CNY on the purchase date, and 1 EUR = 7.74 CNY when the refund posts two weeks later (EUR down 0.8%). Three scenarios:
| Scenario | Debited | Credited | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|
| A. No-FTF card, paid in local currency (best) | 780.00 | 774.00 | 6.00 (pure FX drift) |
| B. 1.5% FTF card, paid in local currency | 791.70 | 774.00 | 17.70 (6 FX + 11.70 unrefunded fee) |
| C. DCC'd (+4% in, โ4% out) | 811.20 | 743.04 | 68.16 โ 8.4% gone |
Look at the spread: the same โฌ100 item, bought and returned โ 6 lost in the best case (uncontrollable FX), 68 in the worst, of which 62 was entirely avoidable. You can't control the market. DCC and fees, though, are decided in the three seconds at the checkout terminal.
โ Work out your own loss in the calculator
To be clear: a smaller refund caused purely by market movement is not disputable โ the bank applied the rules correctly. But these are worth raising with your issuer:
Disputes have deadlines (network-dependent, commonly 120 days from the transaction) โ don't sit on it. Submit both receipts, the statement screenshots and your own calculation of the gap; it moves much faster that way.
Usually not. A few issuers (especially travel-focused products) refund it pro rata, but that's the exception. To be sure, read the foreign-transaction-fee line in your card's fee schedule, or simply ask the bank whether the fee is returned on a refund.
The rate moved in your favour over that window. Perfectly normal, and no, the bank won't come back to claw it โ it's the other face of two conversions.
On the no currency-conversion-fee front it's usually cheaper (see currency conversion fees) โ one less USD-routing layer. But the two-date conversion still applies; the market-drift part is unavoidable either way.
Exactly like a full one: the returned foreign-currency amount is converted on its own at the refund's posting date, with no relationship to the original transaction's rate. So half the goods back is definitely not half your original debit back.
No โ and that's good news. A pre-authorization only holds your limit; no money actually moved. Releasing it removes the hold, with no conversion and no loss. If instead you see the deposit actually charged and then returned (two statement lines), you're in refund territory and the FX loss applies.
A cross-border refund is a separate new transaction, converted at its own posting date's rate, and the fees usually stay gone. Accept the few units lost to market drift โ but the 8% from DCC is yours to refuse: pick local currency at checkout, and ask for a void rather than a refund at the counter. Those two habits save more over a year than most people expect.
Read next: What is DCC ยท The complete guide to cards abroad ยท Finding a no-FTF card